#World anvil examples free#
The limit of two settings for the free version definitely stings, but I can hardly blame them for wanting to get paid. The free version of World Anvil looks very strong. I feel confident that I could make sense of this, with more digging than I’m going to do right now. There are also a couple of things that I think I’m not understanding quite right – some pages that it seems like should be populated with content I’ve created, but are just showing their title and the ads (because, again, free version). It’s a tough value proposition when I only need one feature! In World Anvil, there’s a free scheduling function, but (from what I can find on a quick search) its only option is telling your players when the session is, rather than providing a space to discuss scheduling.
I’m looking into Obsidian Portal because I already have an account there, but event scheduling and all forms of calendar access are paid features there.
#World anvil examples plus#
Second, I’m one of those who is devastated by the demise of Google Plus – my campaign’s G+ Community was our primary medium for session scheduling. Also, the paid tiers offer numerous improvements to map functionality. Those location markers can link to all of the other content in your setting. Instead, you can upload images (such as a scan of a hand-drawn map, as I’ve done) and tag them with location markers. This isn’t that – if there’s a drawing function at all, I haven’t found it yet. Both are firmly outside the mission statement of “a very tarted-up wiki.” Before I dug until this, the name “World Anvil” got my hopes up that I’d be looking at a fully-featured world-cartography toolset. There are two things that World Anvil doesn’t do that would make it a killer app for me. I haven’t explored much beyond 5e, but I can say that the templates for 5e content look thorough without becoming simply overwhelming. World Anvil also has system-specific handling for an enormous number of tabletop games. To put that another way, they’ve paid attention to GMing and world-building best practices, and coded that into each template. “Room” has a different set of fields, prompting you to think more deeply about what you’re writing and make sure that you’re making everything as interesting as possible. “Generic” has fields for Location Type, Alternative Name(s), Purpose (including a link to collected inspiration), Alterations, Architecture (also with a link to a video), History, Parent Location, Date That Became a Ruin, Ruler/Owner, and Owning Organization. For example, just within the Building template, there are two tabs, Generic and Room. Each template page has a few separate text boxes to describe the topic, in addition to a general text box at the top. The second part of their solution is the real power move. Each type of template has a name, an icon, and mouseover text that suggests what kinds of stuff might go in that template. Say you’ve been writing for awhile and you’ve knocked out six or seven good entries, but you don’t know what you want to write next. Templated wiki pages aren’t revolutionary in themselves, but displaying all of them together seems like it would work well to jog one’s imagination. The first is that all of your navigation options that let you create a new page show all the different kinds of page templates you could create. The thing I adore about World Anvil is that they seem to know this, and they’ve done two key things to address it. I don’t know why this is, but it’s certainly my experience. If you’ve used just about any kind of campaign wiki for your setting-building before, you probably know that a blank wiki page is even more daunting than a blank Word document, OneNote page, or blog post field. To be clear, I’m using the free version there are four paid options as well, with an increasing variety of features. This is the other kind, and I’m fascinated with the kinds of additional features it offers. I’ve been storing and presenting tabletop campaigns in wikis since 2005 or so, though mostly the super minimalist PBWiki/PBWorks. The short version of what goes on here is that it’s a very dolled-up setting-and-campaign wiki. They’re advertising on Tribality, but I don’t believe that has affected what I want to say about them in this review. Many GMs around these parts are also dedicated world-builders, so today I’m looking into World Anvil, a browser-based world-building toolset.
0 kommentar(er)
